Skip to content

FPL · Gameweek log

GW7 reflection 2026/27

Published Tue 20 Oct · version 2

The week in five lines

  1. 1 · Team goals26 goals against 29.7 expected.Ratings updated
  2. 2 · Positions and playing time22 players we had at 70%+ to start didn't.17 start chances moved
  3. 3 · Injuries, suspensions and congestionLiverpool lost Szoboszlai and Frimpong.Rotation measured
  4. 4 · Set piecesNo change to FPL's set-piece takers.No change
  5. 5 · CaptaincyHaaland scored 13; the underlying-form pick, Saka, 3; last week's top scorer, João Pedro, 2.Premium 112 v xGI form 28

What the model changed this week

Updated automatically

  • Team ratings refreshed from GW7 closing prices (see)
  • GW8 start chances: 17 moved by 20+ points (see)
  • Injury and suspension flags: 13 new or worse, 7 cleared (see)

Method changes since the GW7 deadline

None.

Watching and considering

  • B.Fernandes at right wing: one match so far
  • Palmer at attacking midfield: one match so far
  • Mbeumo at centre-forward: one match so far
  • Lower start chances after a European or cup midweek (not modelled yet; measured each week in this section)
  • A source for who takes each penalty

1 of 5

Team goals

26 goals against 29.7 expected. Chances were down too (xG 27.1), so the shortfall was in chances created, not just finishing.

Expected v chances v goals, by team

Expected at the deadlinexG (chances)Goals
Each team: expected goals at the deadline, xG and goals
TeamChartGoals v expxG v exp
Brighton v CRY+3.1+0.4
Ipswich @ MCI+1.2+1.1
Tottenham v COV+1.0−1.2
Bournemouth v SUN+0.4+2.7
Chelsea @ EVE+0.4−0.2
Liverpool @ BRE+0.40.0
Manchester City v IPS+0.2+0.5
Coventry @ TOT0.0−0.3
Leeds v MUN−0.3+0.1
Aston Villa @ NEW−0.4+0.2
Brentford v LIV−0.5−0.7
Manchester United @ LEE−0.7−0.7
Arsenal @ NFO−0.8−0.6
Nottingham Forest v ARS−0.9+0.1
Fulham v HUL−0.9−0.5
Hull @ FUL−0.9−0.7
Sunderland @ BOU−1.1−1.0
Crystal Palace @ BHA−1.1−0.3
Everton v CHE−1.2−0.8
Newcastle v AVL−1.7−0.7

Signal: chances

Bournemouth made 4.3 xG against 1.6 expected and scored 2. Chance creation running ahead of the market is the kind of result that can move a rating.

Noise: finishing

Brighton scored 5 from 2.3 xG (expected 1.9). A big week for their attackers, but finishing streaks rarely carry into the next match.

The season so far: where the market has been wrong

Season xG compared with the goals the closing prices expected, per team. These are the gaps the ratings can still close.

Creating more than expected

  • Brighton+4.5
  • Sunderland+3.3
  • Bournemouth+3.0
  • Nottingham Forest+2.8

Creating less than expected

  • Tottenham−3.6
  • Newcastle−3.2
  • Chelsea−2.2
  • Liverpool−2.1

Allowing less than expected

  • Hull+3.4
  • Bournemouth+2.7
  • Coventry+2.5
  • Nottingham Forest+1.9

Allowing more than expected

  • Sunderland−3.5
  • Crystal Palace−3.3
  • Manchester City−2.9
  • Newcastle−1.9

What changes in the model

Changed

Team ratings come from bookmakers’ closing prices, not results, so they move when the market’s view moves: results backed by chances tend to move it, finishing luck mostly doesn’t.

Biggest movers since the deadline, and what that does to their next five fixtures (GW8–12):

Team rating moves since the deadline
Manchester United1.87 → 1.751.29 → 1.299.3 → 8.77.2 → 7.1
Brighton1.49 → 1.571.37 → 1.347.4 → 7.97.7 → 7.6
Sunderland1.14 → 1.111.42 → 1.356.0 → 5.86.9 → 6.6
Arsenal1.91 → 1.980.88 → 0.869.9 → 10.44.6 → 4.5
Leeds1.34 → 1.341.37 → 1.296.9 → 6.96.9 → 6.4
Bournemouth1.45 → 1.401.44 → 1.407.5 → 7.27.2 → 6.9

Attack and conceding are goals per match against an average side, at the deadline → now.

2 of 5

Positions and playing time

22 players we had at 70%+ to start didn't. 2 were flagged by FPL beforehand. Cherki (84%, 38% owned) was the costly one. B.Fernandes played right wing instead of attacking midfield.

start forecast error (Brier) over 667 players; 0.25 is a coin flip
0.089
at 70%+ to start who didn’t (2 flagged by FPL)
22
started from under 30%
22
played a different line from the model’s
13

Expected to start, didn’t

Players over 70% to start who didn't
Cherki Manchester City84%0
Gvardiol Manchester City73%29
Schade Brentford71%45
Semenyo Manchester City96%13
Gibbs-White Nottingham Forest73%0
Cunha Manchester United94%6

Started against the odds

Players under 30% to start who did
Maddison Tottenham0%9
Dominguez Nottingham Forest4%3
Bouaddi Manchester City1%2
Norton-Cuffy Hull2%2
Tosin Tottenham2%2
Walton Ipswich3%2

Played a different line

Players who changed line
ModelPlayed
B.Fernandes Manchester UnitedAMRW
Palmer ChelseaRWAM
Mbeumo Manchester UnitedRWCF
Wissa NewcastleAMCF
O'Reilly Manchester CityCMLB
Belloumi HullRWBRW

Plus 29 who changed position within the same line.

Taken off early (4)
Starters expected to play 70+ minutes who went off before 60
Martinez Manchester United71′45′
Willock Newcastle78′55′
Timber Crystal Palace75′45′
Fernandez-Pardo Newcastle76′55′

What changes in the model

ChangedWatching

GW8 start chances that moved most since the deadline, and why:

Start chances for next gameweek now, against this gameweek's deadline
Why
Martinez Chelsea96%0%Head injury - Unknown return date
Semenyo Manchester City96%0%Knee injury - Unknown return date
Janelt Brentford93%0%Suspended until 31 Oct
Isak Liverpool23%92%fit again (FPL flag cleared)
Gakpo Liverpool22%86%fit again (FPL flag cleared)
Elanga Newcastle0%58%Unspecified injury - Expected back 25 Oct
Mykolenko Everton38%81%fit again (FPL flag cleared)
Ndiaye Manchester City50%90%start record 6 of 7

WatchingB.Fernandes at right wing: one match so far. A new position is recorded as one the player also plays; if it repeats, his role (and goal share) changes.

WatchingPalmer at attacking midfield: one match so far. A new position is recorded as one the player also plays; if it repeats, his role (and goal share) changes.

WatchingMbeumo at centre-forward: one match so far. A new position is recorded as one the player also plays; if it repeats, his role (and goal share) changes.

3 of 5

Injuries, suspensions and congestion

Liverpool lost Szoboszlai and Frimpong. 9 teams played midweek before GW7; their likely starters still made 69 of the 71 starts we expected.

New or worse since the deadline

Players whose availability got worse since the deadline
Now
Haaland Manchester CitydoubtfulUnspecified injury - 75% chance of playing
Szoboszlai LiverpoolinjuredHamstring injury - Unknown return date
Semenyo Manchester CityinjuredKnee injury - Unknown return date
O'Reilly Manchester CitydoubtfulBack injury - 75% chance of playing
Brobbey SunderlanddoubtfulHamstring injury - 75% chance of playing
Martinez ChelseainjuredHead injury - Unknown return date
Manzambi Aston VilladoubtfulCalf injury - 75% chance of playing
Janelt BrentfordsuspendedSuspended until 31 Oct

And 5 more.

Back

Schade, Isak, Gakpo, Mykolenko, Branthwaite, Robinson, Mateta

Sent off

Janelt (Brentford), Yarmoliuk (Brentford), Sessegnon (Fulham), Danso (Sunderland)

Fixture congestion

Before GW7, 9 teams had a cup or European match:

Teams with a cup or European match before their next league match
Aston VillaWed 14 Oct: Fenerbahçe (h) Champions LeagueSat 17:30: Newcastle (a)3 days
BournemouthThu 15 Oct: Sturm Graz (h) Europa LeagueSun 14:00: Sunderland (h)3 days
BrightonThu 15 Oct: Kauno Žalgiris (h) Conference LeagueSun 14:00: Crystal Palace (h)3 days
Crystal PalaceThu 15 Oct: Lyon (a) Europa LeagueSun 14:00: Brighton (a)3 days
LiverpoolWed 14 Oct: LASK (a) Champions LeagueSat 15:00: Brentford (a)3 days
Manchester CityWed 14 Oct: Paris Saint-Germain (h) Champions LeagueSat 15:00: Ipswich (h)3 days
SunderlandThu 15 Oct: Torreense (a) Europa LeagueSun 14:00: Bournemouth (a)3 days
ArsenalTue 13 Oct: Lille (h) Champions LeagueSun 16:30: Nottingham Forest (a)5 days
Manchester UnitedTue 13 Oct: Atletico Madrid (a) Champions LeagueSun 14:00: Leeds (a)5 days

Did they rotate?

Likely starters (70%+ at the deadline): expected starts against actual, teams with a midweek match and the rest
TeamsLikely startersExpected startsStartedRate v expected
Played midweek (9)7871.269−3%
Didn’t (11)9988.086−2%

One gameweek is a small sample; this builds week by week into the evidence for whether to model congestion.

Before GW8, 9 teams play midweek: rest days and the teams affected are in the GW8 preview.

What changes in the model

ChangedNot modelled
  • Injuries and suspensions feed straight into start chances (see the start-chance moves above).
  • Midweek matches are not modelled. Start chances ignore rest days. Each reflection now compares how often likely starters at teams with a midweek match actually started against teams without one; if they start noticeably less over several weeks, that is the case for adding it to the model.
Price changes since the deadline (16)
Price changes since the deadline
João Pedro Chelsea£7.8m£7.9m72.8%
Calafiori Arsenal£5.9m£6.0m53.8%
Rogers Chelsea£7.9m£8.0m48%
Groß Brighton£6.1m£6.2m45.3%
De Cuyper Brighton£5.2m£5.3m41%
Cherki Manchester City£7.9m£8.0m37.7%
Virgil Liverpool£6.5m£6.4m15.3%
Wissa Newcastle£6.2m£6.1m14.1%
Gibbs-White Nottingham Forest£8.0m£7.9m11.4%
Diop Ipswich£4.0m£3.9m11%
Tavernier Bournemouth£6.1m£6.2m9.2%
Manzambi Aston Villa£5.9m£6.0m2.8%
Doku Manchester City£7.4m£7.5m2.4%
Aina Nottingham Forest£4.4m£4.3m1.8%
Robinson Fulham£4.5m£4.4m1.3%
Khusanov Manchester City£5.4m£5.3m1.2%

4 of 5

Set pieces

No change to FPL's set-piece takers. No penalties missed. Our penalty taker differs from FPL's at 1 club.

No change in FPL’s first-choice set-piece takers since the deadline.

penalties missed
0
clubs where our penalty taker differs from FPL’s
1
our set-piece hierarchy last reviewed
Sat 19 Sept

What changes in the model

No change neededData gap

The projection gives set-piece chances to the takers in our own hierarchy (left and right corners, free kicks, penalties), which is reviewed by hand. FPL’s order is a cross-check, not an input.

Penalty takers that differ: Coventry (FPL Rudoni; ours Wright).

We can’t see who took each penalty. FPL’s data doesn’t say which goals were penalties, so a new taker only shows up when FPL changes its order. A source for penalty events would let us spot it sooner.

5 of 5

Captaincy

Haaland scored 13; the underlying-form pick, Saka, 3; last week's top scorer, João Pedro, 2. Since GW2, captaining the premium every week has 112 captain points; underlying form 28 and chasing last week's top scorer 32.

This week: the range at the deadline, and where each landed

Middle 80% of simulated outcomesMedianWhat he scored
Captain candidates: simulated range of points at the deadline and actual points
CandidateRange≤210+Pts
Haaland most captained3%35%13
Saka underlying form9%16%3
João Pedro last week's top scorer20%11%2

≤2: chance of 2 points or fewer. 10+: chance of 10 or more (before doubling). From 20,000 simulated gameweeks using the projections at the deadline.

Season so far: return and volatility (GW2–7)

Captain points by approach this season
Premium every week1129.33.161302
Underlying form282.31.01440
Last week's top scorer322.72.30740
Hindsight best18015.04.3122306
  • Premium every week: FPL's most-captained player each gameweek.
  • Underlying form: most expected goal involvements (xGI) over the previous 4 gameweeks, among midfielders and forwards who cost £7.0m+ at the start of the season, played 180+ minutes in them and started their last match; never the premium.
  • Last week's top scorer: most points in the previous gameweek among the same players; never the premium.
  • Hindsight best: the top scorer among those players and the premium (a ceiling, not a strategy).
  • Model's top projection: the highest projection at each deadline (saved from GW6).
  • Per week, worst and best are points before doubling; spread is the standard deviation; a blank is 2 points or fewer.

The model’s top projection has been saved since GW6: 30 captain points so far against 38 for the premium in the same weeks.

Over four seasons

No model change

The most-captained player blanked in 27.7% of gameweeks from 2022/23 to 2025/26 and was the best choice in only 19.9%, yet scored the most over the four seasons. A few weeks of this season decide very little. See should you always captain the top pick and should you always captain Haaland.

Week by week
Captain choices week by week (points)
PremiumxGI formLast top scorerModelBest
1Haaland 2–––Palmer 13
2Haaland 13Szoboszlai 4Palmer 7–B.Fernandes 23
3Haaland 9B.Fernandes 2B.Fernandes 2–Isak 13
4Haaland 9B.Fernandes 2Isak 2–João Pedro 12
5Haaland 6B.Fernandes 2João Pedro 0–Semenyo 17
6Haaland 6B.Fernandes 1Semenyo 3Saka 2Doku 12
7Haaland 13Saka 3João Pedro 2Haaland 13Haaland 13

How this was worked out

Generated from the data on Tue 20 Oct; nothing is written by hand. Expected goals at the deadline: deadline snapshot (market goals). Start chances and roles are the ones the projections had at the deadline (Sat 17 Oct). xG is FPL’s. Team ratings come from bookmakers’ closing prices, including this gameweek’s. Players listed are owned by 1%+ or among the 50 highest projected for the next five gameweeks.

FPL weekly email

One email before each deadline: our top captains, flagged players, price changes and the gameweek preview.

Add your FPL team and club (optional)

Adds a “Your team” section: your flagged players, price moves and best captain, and your club’s next game.

We’ll email you a link to confirm. Unsubscribe in one click from any email. See our privacy notice.